<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Search Engine Optimization for Site Owners and Small Businesses</title>
	<link>http://www.seo-blog.com</link>
	<description>SEO Blog is a blog with a purpose</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nofollow in Google, Yahoo and MSN by Debojyoti</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/rel-nofollow.php#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>Debojyoti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seo-blog.com/rel-nofollow.php#comment-850</guid>
		<description>I am absolutely sure that Yahoo does not give any weightage in SERPs from nofollow links. You can read that from Yahoo Help itself. As for Google, I have seen my pages indexed just from a nofollow blog comment on mashable. 

The other things you said are pretty true. But the nofollow algo has changed a lot from the time you wrote this post to now in 2009. I think I read something like that from Google.

Thanks anyways</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am absolutely sure that Yahoo does not give any weightage in SERPs from nofollow links. You can read that from Yahoo Help itself. As for Google, I have seen my pages indexed just from a nofollow blog comment on mashable. </p>
<p>The other things you said are pretty true. But the nofollow algo has changed a lot from the time you wrote this post to now in 2009. I think I read something like that from Google.</p>
<p>Thanks anyways</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Image Search by English Dubbed Anime</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/image-search.php#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>English Dubbed Anime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seo-blog.com/image-search.php#comment-849</guid>
		<description>Hey,

I've been trying to get my website images indexed. I only have something like 7 images out of 800 indexed, and get 0 traffic from them thus far. I have longtail keyword titles, folders, everything. 

Any help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to get my website images indexed. I only have something like 7 images out of 800 indexed, and get 0 traffic from them thus far. I have longtail keyword titles, folders, everything. </p>
<p>Any help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What do search engine spammers look like? by duz</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/search-engine-spammers.php#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>duz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 07:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seo-blog.com/search-engine-spammers.php#comment-210</guid>
		<description>That is a very good question vingold and I have always thought very carefully about interlinking a client's network. I don't think there is a 'one size fits all' solution but I do now routinely remove from client's networked sites all external sitewide links and all inter-network non-contextual links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a very good question vingold and I have always thought very carefully about interlinking a client&#8217;s network. I don&#8217;t think there is a &#8216;one size fits all&#8217; solution but I do now routinely remove from client&#8217;s networked sites all external sitewide links and all inter-network non-contextual links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What do search engine spammers look like? by vingold</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/search-engine-spammers.php#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>vingold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seo-blog.com/search-engine-spammers.php#comment-209</guid>
		<description>I've been mulling this over, and here is my question.

Suppose you are not a spammer, but you do have a network of websites all of which are linked to each other through external navigation, footer/site info, etc.

For instance, maybe you run a regional website and all of your sites are related by geography.  So you might have a network of 25 websites for Florida - broken out like MiamiBoats.com, FortLauderdaleBoats.com, KeyWestBoats.com, etc.

Also each site has unique content - all original to the site itself and genuinely unique.

If you wanted to promote these sites across other the whole network - is there a better way to do it than by linking to each other through some form of external navigation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been mulling this over, and here is my question.</p>
<p>Suppose you are not a spammer, but you do have a network of websites all of which are linked to each other through external navigation, footer/site info, etc.</p>
<p>For instance, maybe you run a regional website and all of your sites are related by geography.  So you might have a network of 25 websites for Florida - broken out like MiamiBoats.com, FortLauderdaleBoats.com, KeyWestBoats.com, etc.</p>
<p>Also each site has unique content - all original to the site itself and genuinely unique.</p>
<p>If you wanted to promote these sites across other the whole network - is there a better way to do it than by linking to each other through some form of external navigation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hidden Text (Revisited) by duz</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/hidden-text-revisited.php#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>duz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seo-blog.com/hidden-text-revisited.php#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I agree randie. Google does not hand review spam reports because they would have to double their staff! The spam reports go into a database which is used for testing the spam detection component of the algo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree randie. Google does not hand review spam reports because they would have to double their staff! The spam reports go into a database which is used for testing the spam detection component of the algo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hidden Text (Revisited) by randie</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/hidden-text-revisited.php#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>randie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seo-blog.com/hidden-text-revisited.php#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Hidden text is still almost a regular practice for some webmasters. Especially in my country, Turkey. These webmasters do it for a good reason though: You can spam with literally any method and get away with it. These codes go unnoticed by Google. I don't understand why Google should index text of 1 pixel, and send visitors to that spammed page just because that 1-px keyword is there. This is 2007 not 1998. Consider this : http://www.modernperdesistemleri.com/resim_galerisi.htm
This site, while unbelievable, ranks #1 for a rather competetive keyword.

Reporting cheaters is the only way left but these reports are never reviewed, at least in last 2 years. Never heard any Turkish site got punished that way either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hidden text is still almost a regular practice for some webmasters. Especially in my country, Turkey. These webmasters do it for a good reason though: You can spam with literally any method and get away with it. These codes go unnoticed by Google. I don&#8217;t understand why Google should index text of 1 pixel, and send visitors to that spammed page just because that 1-px keyword is there. This is 2007 not 1998. Consider this : <a href="http://www.modernperdesistemleri.com/resim_galerisi.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.modernperdesistemleri.com/resim_galerisi.htm</a><br />
This site, while unbelievable, ranks #1 for a rather competetive keyword.</p>
<p>Reporting cheaters is the only way left but these reports are never reviewed, at least in last 2 years. Never heard any Turkish site got punished that way either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Keyword Research by robstroy</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/keyword-research.php#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>robstroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seo-blog.com/keyword-research.php#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Aside from Wordtracker and Keyword Discovery you can also use for your keyword research the &lt;a href="http://www.keywordspy.com/ " rel="nofollow"&gt;KeywordSpy&lt;/a&gt; - a keyword research technology that will help you know your competitor's online marketing strategies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from Wordtracker and Keyword Discovery you can also use for your keyword research the <a href="http://www.keywordspy.com/ " rel="nofollow">KeywordSpy</a> - a keyword research technology that will help you know your competitor&#8217;s online marketing strategies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The LSI Myth by llimllib</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/latent-semantic-index-lsi-myth.php#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>llimllib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seo-blog.com/latent-semantic-index-lsi-myth.php#comment-132</guid>
		<description>I just want to write in to mention that &lt;a href="http://lsa.colorado.edu/papers/JASIS.lsi.90.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;the paper which introduced LSI&lt;/a&gt; is a very worthwhile, and surprisingly readable, source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to write in to mention that <a href="http://lsa.colorado.edu/papers/JASIS.lsi.90.pdf" rel="nofollow">the paper which introduced LSI</a> is a very worthwhile, and surprisingly readable, source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yahoo User Interface Library by protheus</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/yahoo-user-interface-library.php#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>protheus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seo-blog.com/yahoo-user-interface-library.php#comment-131</guid>
		<description>I haven't been around for a long time but i'm back now and as usual you give out some new toys. Any new easy to use dhtml is welcome but these tools look the part. I hope to enjoy and implement a few of these in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t been around for a long time but i&#8217;m back now and as usual you give out some new toys. Any new easy to use dhtml is welcome but these tools look the part. I hope to enjoy and implement a few of these in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Position and Clickthrough Tool by tophatsolutions</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/position-and-clickthrough-tool.php#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>tophatsolutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seo-blog.com/position-and-clickthrough-tool.php#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Thank You Michael

I will recommend this tool to many people as i see this tool has much potential

Thanks
Stephen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You Michael</p>
<p>I will recommend this tool to many people as i see this tool has much potential</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
