<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hidden Text (Revisited)</title>
	<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/hidden-text-revisited.php</link>
	<description>SEO Blog is a blog with a purpose</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: duz</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/hidden-text-revisited.php#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>duz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seo-blog.com/hidden-text-revisited.php#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I agree randie. Google does not hand review spam reports because they would have to double their staff! The spam reports go into a database which is used for testing the spam detection component of the algo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree randie. Google does not hand review spam reports because they would have to double their staff! The spam reports go into a database which is used for testing the spam detection component of the algo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randie</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/hidden-text-revisited.php#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>randie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seo-blog.com/hidden-text-revisited.php#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Hidden text is still almost a regular practice for some webmasters. Especially in my country, Turkey. These webmasters do it for a good reason though: You can spam with literally any method and get away with it. These codes go unnoticed by Google. I don't understand why Google should index text of 1 pixel, and send visitors to that spammed page just because that 1-px keyword is there. This is 2007 not 1998. Consider this : http://www.modernperdesistemleri.com/resim_galerisi.htm
This site, while unbelievable, ranks #1 for a rather competetive keyword.

Reporting cheaters is the only way left but these reports are never reviewed, at least in last 2 years. Never heard any Turkish site got punished that way either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hidden text is still almost a regular practice for some webmasters. Especially in my country, Turkey. These webmasters do it for a good reason though: You can spam with literally any method and get away with it. These codes go unnoticed by Google. I don&#8217;t understand why Google should index text of 1 pixel, and send visitors to that spammed page just because that 1-px keyword is there. This is 2007 not 1998. Consider this : <a href="http://www.modernperdesistemleri.com/resim_galerisi.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.modernperdesistemleri.com/resim_galerisi.htm</a><br />
This site, while unbelievable, ranks #1 for a rather competetive keyword.</p>
<p>Reporting cheaters is the only way left but these reports are never reviewed, at least in last 2 years. Never heard any Turkish site got punished that way either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duz</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/hidden-text-revisited.php#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>duz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 23:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seo-blog.com/hidden-text-revisited.php#comment-124</guid>
		<description>That is a good question oronm and I don't know the answer at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a good question oronm and I don&#8217;t know the answer at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oronm</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/hidden-text-revisited.php#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>oronm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seo-blog.com/hidden-text-revisited.php#comment-123</guid>
		<description>what puzzles me the most : How does google know wether the hidden text represents a graphic headline or is just a black hat trick ? 
i know they are scanning css now BUT what if the background image for the  headline isn't given to the H2 (in some cases i give it to the wrapper div for more control).

Any thougnts ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what puzzles me the most : How does google know wether the hidden text represents a graphic headline or is just a black hat trick ?<br />
i know they are scanning css now BUT what if the background image for the  headline isn&#8217;t given to the H2 (in some cases i give it to the wrapper div for more control).</p>
<p>Any thougnts ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheDisneyBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-blog.com/hidden-text-revisited.php#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>TheDisneyBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seo-blog.com/hidden-text-revisited.php#comment-119</guid>
		<description>I wanted to thank you for posting about my Saga. I've posted a summary and some lessons learned here:

http://www.thedisneyblog.com/tdb/2007/01/google_delistin.html

-John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to thank you for posting about my Saga. I&#8217;ve posted a summary and some lessons learned here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedisneyblog.com/tdb/2007/01/google_delistin.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedisneyblog.com/tdb/2007/01/google_delistin.html</a></p>
<p>-John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
